How much is Fudfomo worthto your exchange?

Adjust the inputs below to match your exchange's profile. All fields are pre-filled with industry benchmarks. Change any of them.

Layer 1

The Confidence Zone

Hard operational savings you can defend to any CFO. We use a conservative 15% ticket deflection rate and assume you recover half of the compliance time currently spent on content review.

Support Operations

benchmark
benchmark
$
benchmark25%
5%60%

Compliance Team

benchmark
benchmark
$
benchmark20%
5%80%

Annual support ticket saving

$337,500

15% deflection of education-related tickets

Annual compliance time recovery

$16,000

50% of review time recovered per FTE

Minimum annual floor

$353,500

Conservative operational savings only

Layer 2

The Upside Model

Your numbers, your model. We don't claim to know your churn rate: you do. Input your exchange's data to see the revenue sensitivity of a churn improvement.

benchmark
benchmark
$
benchmark5%
0.5%20%
0.5%
0.1%2%

A 0.5pp reduction on your 5% monthly churn rate = recovering 10% of current churn.

Content Monetisation

Earn a 30% commission on every user who subscribes to Fudfomo at $13/month. Adjust the conversion rate to reflect your user base.

benchmark5%
0.5%25%
$13/mo per subscriber×30% commission=$3.90/user/mo

25,000 subscribers at current conversion rate

Annual revenue impact

$750,000

0.5pp churn reduction on 500,000 MAU at $25/mo ARPU

Sensitivity

ScenarioAnnual impact
0.25pp (Conservative)$375,000
0.50pp (Base case)$750,000
1.00pp (Optimistic)$1,500,000

These are sensitivity estimates. Actual impact depends on your user base and current churn drivers.

Annual subscription commission

$1,170,000

25,000 subscribers × $3.90/mo commission × 12

Layer 3

Strategic Value

Context around the model, not a line item. These are the considerations that don't fit in a spreadsheet but often drive the final decision.

  • 1

    Fudfomo provides independently-sourced, third-party context that is explicitly not financial advice, creating a documented separation between information and advisory: defensible in any enforcement conversation.

  • 2

    A published methodology, with dedicated frameworks for cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and tokenised real-world assets, constitutes a demonstrable good-faith effort that regulators actively look for under MiCA, FCA Consumer Duty, MAS, and VARA consumer protection frameworks.

  • 3

    Having an auditable, external source for asset information reduces the burden on your compliance team to sign off every piece of user-facing educational content your product team wants to ship.

  • 4

    Third-party independence matters: if the context your users see comes from Fudfomo, not from you, the liability for its framing sits differently than if you wrote it in-house.

Get a copy of this model

Enter your email and we'll send you a PDF of these results.

Ready to build the business case?

We can walk through this model with your own data on a call, and show you exactly how each product maps to the savings above.